I usually wear a 12 in jeans but the 12 felt roomy both through the waist and thigh. I probably could have gone down to a 10. I have less butt than some; I think these pants are best for people with somewhat wider waists and smaller hips/behinds. I know barrel-leg pants are in style, but I prefer wide-leg or boot-cut pants for the reason that I want to wear these with boots. I was going to have to hem them several inches so at least the barrel leg would have been less pronounced. I also wished the main pockets were phone-sized. What I really disliked was that the giant lump where the inseam and crotch curve met. I don't want that rubbing on the inside of my thigh all day! This could have been avoided by using a crotch gusset. Otherwise these seemed tough with not too much stretch. I am giving up on ordering workpants and am going to sew my own.

Waist is way too high. But I do like yh stronger material compared to the thinner ones made for women... Those don't last more than a few months. I would really like to see the loose fit thin ones made with duck, so they can last longer than a few months. I wish they would make them for women the way they are made for men. Guys can wear those thicker pants for years without them wearing out.

These pants are absolutely horrid in fit, I wear a western style boot for work and I can't even pull them over the boot, also i wear a size 6, tried them in an 8 and can barely button them. I've been wearing your relaxed fit in an 8 for years and they fit great. This was a fail for me, and I may have to look for a new brand since the relaxed fit is no longer available.

I read multiple reviews that these ran large, so ordered my normal size 12 and a size 10. Even the 12s were too small, which is strange because my measurements are exactly within the size chart for a 12. I ended up with a 14, which fit with some room. Maybe they're oversized for someone without curves? I'm fairly hourglass shaped so I need some space in the hips and a smaller waist. So the 14s fit in the hips but now I have a bit of a gap in the waist. That's typical for pants for me though. I also ordered a tall, and I wouldn't call these a tall. I'm 5'9" and the talls hit right at my ankle, so I still cuff them. After I found ones that fit, I love them, though.

I first purchased a pair of these pants way back in the 1990's and loved them. Thusly I was devastated when your company stopped making them and took the time 3 years ago to request that you bring them back for us working women who live in the bush. Since you had discontinued them I had to purchase this style in the men's - smallest size 28 waist even though my waist is 26 inches. I was thrilled to see that FINALLY they were being made available again. I just received the 2 pairs I ordered today in the mail - Size 2 as you do not make a 26 inch waist size. Unfortunately when I tried them on I was disappointed in the fit as they are not form fitted as shown in the description. The description on the tag of the pants states "balloon leg" fit. For someone such as myself this means that my legs are literally drowning in material - way to big. This makes no sense to me in designing the pants this way; most women with a small waist such as myself would not have huge weight lifter legs. So two things: 1. The leg/fit does not match what is stated on website verses what is stated on the tag of the pants. So that discrepancy needs to be rectified. 2. The design for size 2 should not be a "balloon fit" leg as most women that size would not require this kind of fit. I am hoping that washing them in hot water will shrink them a bit. Could you please redesign this pant to fit slimmer in the leg to match the description on the website. The balloon leg fit is why I only rated them 3 star. High waist - 5 star - same weight gauge material as men's 12 oz. - 5 star. Double fronted - 5 star.