0
 

4 out of 5 star rating
 
  
 
  
 
 
4 out of 5 star rating
4.0   5.0
 
   
Rated 1 out of 5
Horrible for me as a tradeswoman
These pants are absolutely horrid in fit, I wear a western style boot for work and I can't even pull them over the boot, also i wear a size 6, tried them in an 8 and can barely button them. I've been wearing your relaxed fit in an 8 for years and they fit great. This was a fail for me, and I may have to look for a new brand since the relaxed fit is no longer available.
Leslie
April 11, 2026
White Lake, MI, US
Rated 4 out of 5
Don't size down
I read multiple reviews that these ran large, so ordered my normal size 12 and a size 10. Even the 12s were too small, which is strange because my measurements are exactly within the size chart for a 12. I ended up with a 14, which fit with some room. Maybe they're oversized for someone without curves? I'm fairly hourglass shaped so I need some space in the hips and a smaller waist. So the 14s fit in the hips but now I have a bit of a gap in the waist. That's typical for pants for me though. I also ordered a tall, and I wouldn't call these a tall. I'm 5'9" and the talls hit right at my ankle, so I still cuff them. After I found ones that fit, I love them, though.
April 11, 2026
, ,
Rated 3 out of 5
Women's Vintage Fit Double - Front Canvas Pant
I first purchased a pair of these pants way back in the 1990's and loved them. Thusly I was devastated when your company stopped making them and took the time 3 years ago to request that you bring them back for us working women who live in the bush. Since you had discontinued them I had to purchase this style in the men's - smallest size 28 waist even though my waist is 26 inches. I was thrilled to see that FINALLY they were being made available again. I just received the 2 pairs I ordered today in the mail - Size 2 as you do not make a 26 inch waist size. Unfortunately when I tried them on I was disappointed in the fit as they are not form fitted as shown in the description. The description on the tag of the pants states "balloon leg" fit. For someone such as myself this means that my legs are literally drowning in material - way to big. This makes no sense to me in designing the pants this way; most women with a small waist such as myself would not have huge weight lifter legs. So two things: 1. The leg/fit does not match what is stated on website verses what is stated on the tag of the pants. So that discrepancy needs to be rectified. 2. The design for size 2 should not be a "balloon fit" leg as most women that size would not require this kind of fit. I am hoping that washing them in hot water will shrink them a bit. Could you please redesign this pant to fit slimmer in the leg to match the description on the website. The balloon leg fit is why I only rated them 3 star. High waist - 5 star - same weight gauge material as men's 12 oz. - 5 star. Double fronted - 5 star.
April 9, 2026
Carcross, YK, CA
Rated 5 out of 5
10/10
Please make this same cut in black and/or green! These are my favorite pants!
RDA2026
April 4, 2026
Greenville, SC, US
Rated 5 out of 5
Perfect fit for tall n curvy
I am so relieved to find a pair of work pants that fit in all the places! I am tall, about 5'10", hourglass shaped, about 160#. The size 10 in tall fit great. A note that they are indeed extremely high waisted - the waist sits on my belly button and crotch a smidge tight when sitting. I usually wear pants ~30" waist and size 8-10. I am glad I ordered on the larger size as the waist would have been too small on the size 8.
J Penny
March 30, 2026
, WA, US