We appreciate your feedback and have sent your suggestions to our Product Design team.
September 18, 2016
3 / 5
4 / 5
4 / 5
Not my type of Jean.
They were to large and baggy. I were a 33waist and 36 length. The waist was to large the length was good. They had to be relaxed fit They were to baggy from the waist to the knees. I like the denim weight could not keep them on all day. Maybe I can wear them in the winter with long underware.
These are genuine original-style straight-leg traditional cut blue jeans. I don't know if I would call them high-waist, but they ride high on the hips like denim should, in my opinion. When you bend over, there won't be a crack problem, if you buy the right size.These are absolutely the best jeans on the market for me, since the other brands that built their name on the butt of the every-day man that works for a living went "high-end" with their styles, and pricing. These are way better, in my opinion--good cut, good-looking, comfortable, and at a price that has me laughing at the "fashionistas" wearing anything else. Also, they are heavier-weight denim, and well-constructed, to last. This is all I'll buy for myself from here on out.
Definitely not low cut, they are more traditional/standard/regular jeans. These jeans are like all the regular jeans we used to buy until recently when they started selling all kinds of different cuts - skinny jeans, boot legs, flares, low-cut, high-waist, etc. These are standard traditional jeans.